Hands-on Exercise 2 part 3

Local Measures of Spatial Autocorrelation

Overview

Here we will compute Global and Local Measure of Spatial Autocorrelation(GLSA). GLSA can be utilised to measure if features are equally distributed across a region. This can be utilised by governing bodies to ensure equal development.

We will utilise the development data of Hunan province in China.

Loading packages and data

Loading packages

pacman::p_load(sf, spdep, tmap, tidyverse)

Loading data

hunan <- st_read(dsn = "data/part 3/geospatial", 
                 layer = "Hunan")

Reading layer `Hunan' from data source 
  `C:\Users\Lian Khye\Desktop\MITB\Geospatial\geartooth\ISSS624\Hands-on_Ex02\data\part 3\geospatial' 
  using driver `ESRI Shapefile'
Simple feature collection with 88 features and 7 fields
Geometry type: POLYGON
Dimension:     XY
Bounding box:  xmin: 108.7831 ymin: 24.6342 xmax: 114.2544 ymax: 30.12812
Geodetic CRS:  WGS 84

hunan2012 <- read_csv("data/part 3/aspatial/Hunan_2012.csv")

Rows: 88 Columns: 29
── Column specification ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Delimiter: ","
chr  (2): County, City
dbl (27): avg_wage, deposite, FAI, Gov_Rev, Gov_Exp, GDP, GDPPC, GIO, Loan, ...

ℹ Use `spec()` to retrieve the full column specification for this data.
ℹ Specify the column types or set `show_col_types = FALSE` to quiet this message.

Relational join of data

Here we will join the hunan2012 dataframe to the polygon or the hunan map. Bascially relating the development data to various regions of Hunan.

hunan <- left_join(hunan,hunan2012) %>%
  select(1:4, 7, 15)

Joining with `by = join_by(County)`

equal <- tm_shape(hunan) +
  tm_fill("GDPPC",
          n = 5,
          style = "equal") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5) +
  tm_layout(main.title = "Equal interval classification")

quantile <- tm_shape(hunan) +
  tm_fill("GDPPC",
          n = 5,
          style = "quantile") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5) +
  tm_layout(main.title = "Equal quantile classification")

tmap_arrange(equal, 
             quantile, 
             asp=1, 
             ncol=2)

Global Spatial Autocorrelation

Here we will compute global spatial autocorrelation statistics and perform a spatial complete randomness test.

Computing Contiguity Spatial Weights

We have to construct a spatial weights or to degine the relationships of the different regions. Here we will use the Queen contiguity weight matrix.

wm_q <- poly2nb(hunan, 
                queen=TRUE)
summary(wm_q)

Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 
Link number distribution:

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 11 
 2  2 12 16 24 14 11  4  2  1 
2 least connected regions:
30 65 with 1 link
1 most connected region:
85 with 11 links

The data shows that there are 88 regions. 1 region has 11 connected and immediate neighbours and 2 regions only having 1.

Row-standardised weight matrix

Next we will assign weights to each neighbour using equal weight. This is done using 1/number of neighbours. We will then sum up the weighted income values.

rswm_q <- nb2listw(wm_q, 
                   style="W", 
                   zero.policy = TRUE)
rswm_q

Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 448 
Percentage nonzero weights: 5.785124 
Average number of links: 5.090909 

Weights style: W 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn S0       S1       S2
W 88 7744 88 37.86334 365.9147

Global Spatial Autocorrelation using Moran’s I test

We will then perform Moran’s I test as seen in Hands-on exercise 1 part 2. Similarly we will also include 1000 simulation.

moran.test(hunan$GDPPC, 
           listw=rswm_q, 
           zero.policy = TRUE, 
           na.action=na.omit)

    Moran I test under randomisation

data:  hunan$GDPPC  
weights: rswm_q    

Moran I statistic standard deviate = 4.7351, p-value = 1.095e-06
alternative hypothesis: greater
sample estimates:
Moran I statistic       Expectation          Variance 
      0.300749970      -0.011494253       0.004348351 

set.seed(1234)
bperm= moran.mc(hunan$GDPPC, 
                listw=rswm_q, 
                nsim=999, 
                zero.policy = TRUE, 
                na.action=na.omit)
bperm

    Monte-Carlo simulation of Moran I

data:  hunan$GDPPC 
weights: rswm_q  
number of simulations + 1: 1000 

statistic = 0.30075, observed rank = 1000, p-value = 0.001
alternative hypothesis: greater

Here we will visualise the Moran’s I test on a histogram.

mean(bperm$res[1:999])

[1] -0.01504572

var(bperm$res[1:999])

[1] 0.004371574

summary(bperm$res[1:999])

    Min.  1st Qu.   Median     Mean  3rd Qu.     Max. 
-0.18339 -0.06168 -0.02125 -0.01505  0.02611  0.27593 

hist(bperm$res, 
     freq=TRUE, 
     breaks=20, 
     xlab="Simulated Moran's I")
abline(v=0, 
       col="red") 

Global Spatial Autocorrelation using Geary’s C test

We will then perform Geary’s C test as seen in Hands-on exercise 1 part 3.Similarly we will also include 1000 simulation.

geary.test(hunan$GDPPC, listw=rswm_q)

    Geary C test under randomisation

data:  hunan$GDPPC 
weights: rswm_q 

Geary C statistic standard deviate = 3.6108, p-value = 0.0001526
alternative hypothesis: Expectation greater than statistic
sample estimates:
Geary C statistic       Expectation          Variance 
        0.6907223         1.0000000         0.0073364 

set.seed(1234)
bperm=geary.mc(hunan$GDPPC, 
               listw=rswm_q, 
               nsim=999)
bperm

    Monte-Carlo simulation of Geary C

data:  hunan$GDPPC 
weights: rswm_q 
number of simulations + 1: 1000 

statistic = 0.69072, observed rank = 1, p-value = 0.001
alternative hypothesis: greater

Here we will visualise the Geary’s C test on a histogram.

mean(bperm$res[1:999])

[1] 1.004402

var(bperm$res[1:999])

[1] 0.007436493

summary(bperm$res[1:999])

   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
 0.7142  0.9502  1.0052  1.0044  1.0595  1.2722 

hist(bperm$res, freq=TRUE, breaks=20, xlab="Simulated Geary c")
abline(v=1, col="red") 

Spatial Correlogram

Here we examine the patterns of the Moran’s I and Geary’s C test as seen in Hands-on Ex 2 part 2.

Moran’s I correlogram

We will use the sp.correlogram() for calculating the spatial correlogram of the devleopment of Hunan.

MI_corr <- sp.correlogram(wm_q, 
                          hunan$GDPPC, 
                          order=6, 
                          method="I", 
                          style="W")
plot(MI_corr)

print(MI_corr)

Spatial correlogram for hunan$GDPPC 
method: Moran's I
         estimate expectation   variance standard deviate Pr(I) two sided    
1 (88)  0.3007500  -0.0114943  0.0043484           4.7351       2.189e-06 ***
2 (88)  0.2060084  -0.0114943  0.0020962           4.7505       2.029e-06 ***
3 (88)  0.0668273  -0.0114943  0.0014602           2.0496        0.040400 *  
4 (88)  0.0299470  -0.0114943  0.0011717           1.2107        0.226015    
5 (88) -0.1530471  -0.0114943  0.0012440          -4.0134       5.984e-05 ***
6 (88) -0.1187070  -0.0114943  0.0016791          -2.6164        0.008886 ** 
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Geary’s C correlogram

We will use the sp.correlogram() for calculating the spatial correlogram of the devleopment of Hunan.

GC_corr <- sp.correlogram(wm_q, 
                          hunan$GDPPC, 
                          order=6, 
                          method="C", 
                          style="W")
plot(GC_corr)

print(GC_corr)

Spatial correlogram for hunan$GDPPC 
method: Geary's C
        estimate expectation  variance standard deviate Pr(I) two sided    
1 (88) 0.6907223   1.0000000 0.0073364          -3.6108       0.0003052 ***
2 (88) 0.7630197   1.0000000 0.0049126          -3.3811       0.0007220 ***
3 (88) 0.9397299   1.0000000 0.0049005          -0.8610       0.3892612    
4 (88) 1.0098462   1.0000000 0.0039631           0.1564       0.8757128    
5 (88) 1.2008204   1.0000000 0.0035568           3.3673       0.0007592 ***
6 (88) 1.0773386   1.0000000 0.0058042           1.0151       0.3100407    
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1

Cluster and Outlier Analysis

Here we will learn how to apply Local Indicators for Spatial Association(LISA) to test for the presence of any clustering of data or if the data are randomly distributed across the space.

Computing local Moran’s I

We will use localmoran(). The values we will utilise are:

• Ii: the local Moran’s I statistics
• E.Ii: the expectation of local moran statistic under the randomisation hypothesis
• Var.Ii: the variance of local moran statistic under the randomisation hypothesis
• Z.Ii:the standard deviate of local moran statistic
• Pr(): the p-value of local moran statistic

Positive I value indicates similar neighboring features while negative values refer to dissimilar values.

fips <- order(hunan$County)
localMI <- localmoran(hunan$GDPPC, rswm_q)
printCoefmat(data.frame(
  localMI[fips,], 
  row.names=hunan$County[fips]),
  check.names=FALSE)

                       Ii        E.Ii      Var.Ii        Z.Ii Pr.z....E.Ii..
Anhua         -2.2493e-02 -5.0048e-03  5.8235e-02 -7.2467e-02         0.9422
Anren         -3.9932e-01 -7.0111e-03  7.0348e-02 -1.4791e+00         0.1391
Anxiang       -1.4685e-03 -2.8150e-05  4.7238e-04 -6.6269e-02         0.9472
Baojing        3.4737e-01 -5.0089e-03  8.3636e-02  1.2185e+00         0.2230
Chaling        2.0559e-02 -9.6812e-04  2.7711e-02  1.2932e-01         0.8971
Changning     -2.9868e-05 -9.0010e-09  1.5105e-07 -7.6828e-02         0.9388
Changsha       4.9022e+00 -2.1348e-01  2.3194e+00  3.3590e+00         0.0008
Chengbu        7.3725e-01 -1.0534e-02  2.2132e-01  1.5895e+00         0.1119
Chenxi         1.4544e-01 -2.8156e-03  4.7116e-02  6.8299e-01         0.4946
Cili           7.3176e-02 -1.6747e-03  4.7902e-02  3.4200e-01         0.7324
Dao            2.1420e-01 -2.0824e-03  4.4123e-02  1.0297e+00         0.3032
Dongan         1.5210e-01 -6.3485e-04  1.3471e-02  1.3159e+00         0.1882
Dongkou        5.2918e-01 -6.4461e-03  1.0748e-01  1.6338e+00         0.1023
Fenghuang      1.8013e-01 -6.2832e-03  1.3257e-01  5.1198e-01         0.6087
Guidong       -5.9160e-01 -1.3086e-02  3.7003e-01 -9.5104e-01         0.3416
Guiyang        1.8240e-01 -3.6908e-03  3.2610e-02  1.0305e+00         0.3028
Guzhang        2.8466e-01 -8.5054e-03  1.4152e-01  7.7931e-01         0.4358
Hanshou        2.5878e-02 -6.0620e-04  1.0167e-02  2.6266e-01         0.7928
Hengdong       9.9964e-03 -4.9063e-04  6.7742e-03  1.2742e-01         0.8986
Hengnan        2.8064e-02 -3.2160e-04  3.7597e-03  4.6294e-01         0.6434
Hengshan      -5.8201e-03 -3.0437e-05  5.1076e-04 -2.5618e-01         0.7978
Hengyang       6.2997e-02 -1.3046e-03  2.1865e-02  4.3486e-01         0.6637
Hongjiang      1.8790e-01 -2.3019e-03  3.1725e-02  1.0678e+00         0.2856
Huarong       -1.5389e-02 -1.8667e-03  8.1030e-02 -4.7503e-02         0.9621
Huayuan        8.3772e-02 -8.5569e-04  2.4495e-02  5.4072e-01         0.5887
Huitong        2.5997e-01 -5.2447e-03  1.1077e-01  7.9685e-01         0.4255
Jiahe         -1.2431e-01 -3.0550e-03  5.1111e-02 -5.3633e-01         0.5917
Jianghua       2.8651e-01 -3.8280e-03  8.0968e-02  1.0204e+00         0.3076
Jiangyong      2.4337e-01 -2.7082e-03  1.1746e-01  7.1800e-01         0.4728
Jingzhou       1.8270e-01 -8.5106e-04  2.4363e-02  1.1759e+00         0.2396
Jinshi        -1.1988e-02 -5.3666e-03  1.1334e-01 -1.9667e-02         0.9843
Jishou        -2.8680e-01 -2.6305e-03  4.4028e-02 -1.3543e+00         0.1756
Lanshan        6.3334e-02 -9.6365e-04  2.0441e-02  4.4972e-01         0.6529
Leiyang        1.1581e-02 -1.4948e-04  2.5082e-03  2.3422e-01         0.8148
Lengshuijiang -1.7903e+00 -8.2129e-02  2.1598e+00 -1.1623e+00         0.2451
Li             1.0225e-03 -2.4048e-07  5.1060e-06  4.5260e-01         0.6508
Lianyuan      -1.4672e-01 -1.8983e-03  1.9145e-02 -1.0467e+00         0.2952
Liling         1.3774e+00 -1.5097e-02  4.2601e-01  2.1335e+00         0.0329
Linli          1.4815e-02 -6.8294e-05  1.4499e-03  3.9086e-01         0.6959
Linwu         -2.4621e-03 -9.0703e-06  1.9258e-04 -1.7676e-01         0.8597
Linxiang       6.5904e-02 -2.9028e-03  2.5470e-01  1.3634e-01         0.8916
Liuyang        3.3688e+00 -7.7502e-02  1.5180e+00  2.7972e+00         0.0052
Longhui        8.0801e-01 -1.1377e-02  1.5538e-01  2.0787e+00         0.0376
Longshan       7.5663e-01 -1.1100e-02  3.1449e-01  1.3690e+00         0.1710
Luxi           1.8177e-01 -2.4855e-03  3.4249e-02  9.9561e-01         0.3194
Mayang         2.1852e-01 -5.8773e-03  9.8049e-02  7.1663e-01         0.4736
Miluo          1.8704e+00 -1.6927e-02  2.7925e-01  3.5715e+00         0.0004
Nan           -9.5789e-03 -4.9497e-04  6.8341e-03 -1.0988e-01         0.9125
Ningxiang      1.5607e+00 -7.3878e-02  8.0012e-01  1.8274e+00         0.0676
Ningyuan       2.0910e-01 -7.0884e-03  8.2306e-02  7.5356e-01         0.4511
Pingjiang     -9.8964e-01 -2.6457e-03  5.6027e-02 -4.1698e+00         0.0000
Qidong         1.1806e-01 -2.1207e-03  2.4747e-02  7.6396e-01         0.4449
Qiyang         6.1966e-02 -7.3374e-04  8.5743e-03  6.7712e-01         0.4983
Rucheng       -3.6992e-01 -8.8999e-03  2.5272e-01 -7.1814e-01         0.4727
Sangzhi        2.5053e-01 -4.9470e-03  6.8000e-02  9.7972e-01         0.3272
Shaodong      -3.2659e-02 -3.6592e-05  5.0546e-04 -1.4510e+00         0.1468
Shaoshan       2.1223e+00 -5.0227e-02  1.3668e+00  1.8583e+00         0.0631
Shaoyang       5.9499e-01 -1.1253e-02  1.3012e-01  1.6807e+00         0.0928
Shimen        -3.8794e-02 -3.8603e-04  6.4756e-03 -4.7729e-01         0.6332
Shuangfeng     9.2835e-03 -2.2867e-03  3.1516e-02  6.5174e-02         0.9480
Shuangpai      8.0591e-02 -3.1366e-04  8.9838e-03  8.5358e-01         0.3933
Suining        3.7585e-01 -3.5933e-03  4.1870e-02  1.8544e+00         0.0637
Taojiang      -2.5394e-01 -1.2395e-03  1.4477e-02 -2.1002e+00         0.0357
Taoyuan        1.4729e-02 -1.2039e-04  8.5103e-04  5.0903e-01         0.6107
Tongdao        4.6482e-01 -6.9870e-03  1.9879e-01  1.0582e+00         0.2900
Wangcheng      4.4220e+00 -1.1067e-01  1.3596e+00  3.8873e+00         0.0001
Wugang         7.1003e-01 -7.8144e-03  1.0710e-01  2.1935e+00         0.0283
Xiangtan       2.4530e-01 -3.6457e-04  3.2319e-03  4.3213e+00         0.0000
Xiangxiang     2.6271e-01 -1.2703e-03  2.1290e-02  1.8092e+00         0.0704
Xiangyin       5.4525e-01 -4.7442e-03  7.9236e-02  1.9539e+00         0.0507
Xinhua         1.1810e-01 -6.2649e-03  8.6001e-02  4.2409e-01         0.6715
Xinhuang       1.5725e-01 -4.1820e-03  3.6648e-01  2.6667e-01         0.7897
Xinning        6.8928e-01 -9.6674e-03  2.0328e-01  1.5502e+00         0.1211
Xinshao        5.7578e-02 -8.5932e-03  1.1769e-01  1.9289e-01         0.8470
Xintian       -7.4050e-03 -5.1493e-03  1.0877e-01 -6.8395e-03         0.9945
Xupu           3.2406e-01 -5.7468e-03  5.7735e-02  1.3726e+00         0.1699
Yanling       -6.9021e-02 -5.9211e-04  9.9306e-03 -6.8667e-01         0.4923
Yizhang       -2.6844e-01 -2.2463e-03  4.7588e-02 -1.2202e+00         0.2224
Yongshun       6.3064e-01 -1.1350e-02  1.8830e-01  1.4795e+00         0.1390
Yongxing       4.3411e-01 -9.0735e-03  1.5088e-01  1.1409e+00         0.2539
You            7.8750e-02 -7.2728e-03  1.2116e-01  2.4714e-01         0.8048
Yuanjiang      2.0004e-04 -1.7760e-04  2.9798e-03  6.9181e-03         0.9945
Yuanling       8.7298e-03 -2.2981e-06  2.3221e-05  1.8121e+00         0.0700
Yueyang        4.1189e-02 -1.9768e-04  2.3113e-03  8.6085e-01         0.3893
Zhijiang       1.0476e-01 -7.8123e-04  1.3100e-02  9.2214e-01         0.3565
Zhongfang     -2.2685e-01 -2.1455e-03  3.5927e-02 -1.1855e+00         0.2358
Zhuzhou        3.2864e-01 -5.2432e-04  7.2391e-03  3.8688e+00         0.0001
Zixing        -7.6849e-01 -8.8210e-02  9.4057e-01 -7.0144e-01         0.4830

Next we will append the local Moran’s I dataframe to the Hunan SpatialPolygonDataFrame. After that we can then map it on the Hunan map using a choropleth map.

hunan.localMI <- cbind(hunan,localMI) %>%
  rename(Pr.Ii = Pr.z....E.Ii..)
tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "Ii", 
          style = "pretty",
          palette = "RdBu",
          title = "local moran statistics") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

Variable(s) "Ii" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.

Mapping p-values of the local Moran’s I data

Here will use p-values that we calculate earlier to map the development clusters of Hunan.

tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "Pr.Ii", 
          breaks=c(-Inf, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, Inf),
          palette="-Blues", 
          title = "local Moran's I p-values") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

Joining the local Moran’s I value and p-value map

On the left is local Moran’s I value map and the right is local Moran’s I p-value map.

localMI.map <- tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "Ii", 
          style = "pretty", 
          title = "local moran statistics") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

pvalue.map <- tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "Pr.Ii", 
          breaks=c(-Inf, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, Inf),
          palette="-Blues", 
          title = "local Moran's I p-values") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

tmap_arrange(localMI.map, pvalue.map, asp=1, ncol=2)

Variable(s) "Ii" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.

LISA cluster map

LISA indicates the extent of significant spatial clustering and the sum of LISA will be proportional to the global spatial data. The LISA cluster map can show the locations with significance by first plotting the Moran scatterplot.

Plotting Moran scatterplot

We will use the moran.plot() to plot the Moran scatterplot.

This sample chart can be used for interpreting the scatterplot.

Local Moran’s I Scatterplot:

nci <- moran.plot(hunan$GDPPC, rswm_q,
                  labels=as.character(hunan$County), 
                  xlab="GDPPC 2012", 
                  ylab="Spatially Lag GDPPC 2012")

• The top right quadrant shows regions that have high development and with high development neighbours.
• The top left shows low development surrounded by other high development neighbours
• The bottom right shows high development surrounded by low development neighbours.
• The bottom left shows low development with low development neighbours.

Scaling with standardised variable

Next we can use scale() to scale the scatterplot to have a smaller X and Y scaling. This is done through dividing the variable by their standard deviation. We will also use vector() to ensure that the data is a dataframe.

hunan$Z.GDPPC <- scale(hunan$GDPPC) %>% 
  as.vector 
nci2 <- moran.plot(hunan$Z.GDPPC, rswm_q,
                   labels=as.character(hunan$County),
                   xlab="z-GDPPC 2012", 
                   ylab="Spatially Lag z-GDPPC 2012")

Preparing LISA map classes

Here we will prepare a LISA cluster map. We will obtain the development of each region and center it around the mean followed by centering the local Moran’s around the mean. We will use a significant level of 5%.

quadrant <- vector(mode="numeric",length=nrow(localMI))
hunan$lag_GDPPC <- lag.listw(rswm_q, hunan$GDPPC)
DV <- hunan$lag_GDPPC - mean(hunan$lag_GDPPC) 
LM_I <- localMI[,1] - mean(localMI[,1]) 
signif <- 0.05 

We can then define the 4 quadrant based on it’s development and if the neighbours have similar development. It will be defined as low-low (1), low-high (2), high-low (3) and high-high (4). Non-significant Moran will be placed into category 0.

quadrant[DV <0 & LM_I>0] <- 1
quadrant[DV >0 & LM_I<0] <- 2
quadrant[DV <0 & LM_I<0] <- 3  
quadrant[DV >0 & LM_I>0] <- 4  
quadrant[localMI[,5]>signif] <- 0

Plotting the LISA map

Here we can then plot the LISA map.

hunan.localMI$quadrant <- quadrant
colors <- c("#ffffff", "#2c7bb6", "#abd9e9", "#fdae61", "#d7191c")
clusters <- c("insignificant", "low-low", "low-high", "high-low", "high-high")

tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "quadrant", 
          style = "cat", 
          palette = colors[c(sort(unique(quadrant)))+1], 
          labels = clusters[c(sort(unique(quadrant)))+1],
          popup.vars = c("")) +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,17)) +
  tm_borders(alpha=0.5)

Red regions represent high development with high development neighbours.

We can also joing the LISA map and the local Moran’s I value map together.

gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")

hunan.localMI$quadrant <- quadrant
colors <- c("#ffffff", "#2c7bb6", "#abd9e9", "#fdae61", "#d7191c")
clusters <- c("insignificant", "low-low", "low-high", "high-low", "high-high")

LISAmap <- tm_shape(hunan.localMI) +
  tm_fill(col = "quadrant", 
          style = "cat", 
          palette = colors[c(sort(unique(quadrant)))+1], 
          labels = clusters[c(sort(unique(quadrant)))+1],
          popup.vars = c("")) +
  tm_view(set.zoom.limits = c(11,17)) +
  tm_borders(alpha=0.5)

tmap_arrange(gdppc, LISAmap, 
             asp=1, ncol=2)

Hot and Cold spot area analysis

We can also utilise hot and cold spots to describe clustering and areas with a higher feature value. Hot spots are used to represent regions with high value of the interested feature.

Getis and Ord’s G statistics

Getis and Ord’s G statistics look at neighbours within a certain distance to check for the presence of clustering. Significant and positive values will indicate hot spots while significant and negative values will indicate cold spots.

It can be broken down into the following steps:

• Deriving spatial weight matrix
• Computing Gi statistics
• Mapping Gi statistics

Deriving distance-based weight matrix

Firstly we will need to set what constitutes a neighbour using distance. There are 2 types of distance-based proximity matrix:

Fixed distance weight matrix

• requires 1 or more neighbours and 8 neighbours if the data is skewed
• will increase variance if sparse data points
• variance will be masked if data points are dense

Adaptive distance weight matrix

• changes bandwidth based on density of data
• find nearest neighbour instead using a fixed distance

Deriving the centroid

Here we will associate a region to a center using coordinates.

Here we will get the longitudinal and latitudinal data before combining them together using cbind()

longitude <- map_dbl(hunan$geometry, ~st_centroid(.x)[[1]])
latitude <- map_dbl(hunan$geometry, ~st_centroid(.x)[[2]])
coords <- cbind(longitude, latitude)

Next we will determine the cut-off distance. The distance will be determined by the max from the output below.

k1 <- knn2nb(knearneigh(coords))
k1dists <- unlist(nbdists(k1, coords, longlat = TRUE))
summary(k1dists)

   Min. 1st Qu.  Median    Mean 3rd Qu.    Max. 
  24.79   32.57   38.01   39.07   44.52   61.79 

The cut off distance is found to be 61.79km in this case.

Computing fixed distance weight matrix

Here we will calculate the fixed distance weight matrix where we will quantify the spatial relationships between features amongst the data.

wm_d62 <- dnearneigh(coords, 0, 62, longlat = TRUE)
wm_d62

Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 324 
Percentage nonzero weights: 4.183884 
Average number of links: 3.681818 

wm62_lw <- nb2listw(wm_d62, style = 'B')
summary(wm62_lw)

Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 324 
Percentage nonzero weights: 4.183884 
Average number of links: 3.681818 
Link number distribution:

 1  2  3  4  5  6 
 6 15 14 26 20  7 
6 least connected regions:
6 15 30 32 56 65 with 1 link
7 most connected regions:
21 28 35 45 50 52 82 with 6 links

Weights style: B 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn  S0  S1   S2
B 88 7744 324 648 5440

Computing adaptive distance weight matrix

Adaptive distance weight matrix refers to the possibility to control the number of neighbours by accepting asymmetrical neightbours or imposing symmetrical.

knn <- knn2nb(knearneigh(coords, k=8))
knn

Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 704 
Percentage nonzero weights: 9.090909 
Average number of links: 8 
Non-symmetric neighbours list

knn_lw <- nb2listw(knn, style = 'B')
summary(knn_lw)

Characteristics of weights list object:
Neighbour list object:
Number of regions: 88 
Number of nonzero links: 704 
Percentage nonzero weights: 9.090909 
Average number of links: 8 
Non-symmetric neighbours list
Link number distribution:

 8 
88 
88 least connected regions:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 with 8 links
88 most connected regions:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 with 8 links

Weights style: B 
Weights constants summary:
   n   nn  S0   S1    S2
B 88 7744 704 1300 23014

Gi statistics

Compute Gi statistics using fixed distance

Here we will be using fixed distance for calculating Gi statistics. The results is set as a Z-score.

• Positive Z-score refers to high clusters
• Negative Z-score refers to low clusters

fips <- order(hunan$County)
gi.fixed <- localG(hunan$GDPPC, wm62_lw)
gi.fixed

 [1]  0.436075843 -0.265505650 -0.073033665  0.413017033  0.273070579
 [6] -0.377510776  2.863898821  2.794350420  5.216125401  0.228236603
[11]  0.951035346 -0.536334231  0.176761556  1.195564020 -0.033020610
[16]  1.378081093 -0.585756761 -0.419680565  0.258805141  0.012056111
[21] -0.145716531 -0.027158687 -0.318615290 -0.748946051 -0.961700582
[26] -0.796851342 -1.033949773 -0.460979158 -0.885240161 -0.266671512
[31] -0.886168613 -0.855476971 -0.922143185 -1.162328599  0.735582222
[36] -0.003358489 -0.967459309 -1.259299080 -1.452256513 -1.540671121
[41] -1.395011407 -1.681505286 -1.314110709 -0.767944457 -0.192889342
[46]  2.720804542  1.809191360 -1.218469473 -0.511984469 -0.834546363
[51] -0.908179070 -1.541081516 -1.192199867 -1.075080164 -1.631075961
[56] -0.743472246  0.418842387  0.832943753 -0.710289083 -0.449718820
[61] -0.493238743 -1.083386776  0.042979051  0.008596093  0.136337469
[66]  2.203411744  2.690329952  4.453703219 -0.340842743 -0.129318589
[71]  0.737806634 -1.246912658  0.666667559  1.088613505 -0.985792573
[76]  1.233609606 -0.487196415  1.626174042 -1.060416797  0.425361422
[81] -0.837897118 -0.314565243  0.371456331  4.424392623 -0.109566928
[86]  1.364597995 -1.029658605 -0.718000620
attr(,"internals")
               Gi      E(Gi)        V(Gi)        Z(Gi) Pr(z != E(Gi))
 [1,] 0.064192949 0.05747126 2.375922e-04  0.436075843   6.627817e-01
 [2,] 0.042300020 0.04597701 1.917951e-04 -0.265505650   7.906200e-01
 [3,] 0.044961480 0.04597701 1.933486e-04 -0.073033665   9.417793e-01
 [4,] 0.039475779 0.03448276 1.461473e-04  0.413017033   6.795941e-01
 [5,] 0.049767939 0.04597701 1.927263e-04  0.273070579   7.847990e-01
 [6,] 0.008825335 0.01149425 4.998177e-05 -0.377510776   7.057941e-01
 [7,] 0.050807266 0.02298851 9.435398e-05  2.863898821   4.184617e-03
 [8,] 0.083966739 0.04597701 1.848292e-04  2.794350420   5.200409e-03
 [9,] 0.115751554 0.04597701 1.789361e-04  5.216125401   1.827045e-07
[10,] 0.049115587 0.04597701 1.891013e-04  0.228236603   8.194623e-01
[11,] 0.045819180 0.03448276 1.420884e-04  0.951035346   3.415864e-01
[12,] 0.049183846 0.05747126 2.387633e-04 -0.536334231   5.917276e-01
[13,] 0.048429181 0.04597701 1.924532e-04  0.176761556   8.596957e-01
[14,] 0.034733752 0.02298851 9.651140e-05  1.195564020   2.318667e-01
[15,] 0.011262043 0.01149425 4.945294e-05 -0.033020610   9.736582e-01
[16,] 0.065131196 0.04597701 1.931870e-04  1.378081093   1.681783e-01
[17,] 0.027587075 0.03448276 1.385862e-04 -0.585756761   5.580390e-01
[18,] 0.029409313 0.03448276 1.461397e-04 -0.419680565   6.747188e-01
[19,] 0.061466754 0.05747126 2.383385e-04  0.258805141   7.957856e-01
[20,] 0.057656917 0.05747126 2.371303e-04  0.012056111   9.903808e-01
[21,] 0.066518379 0.06896552 2.820326e-04 -0.145716531   8.841452e-01
[22,] 0.045599896 0.04597701 1.928108e-04 -0.027158687   9.783332e-01
[23,] 0.030646753 0.03448276 1.449523e-04 -0.318615290   7.500183e-01
[24,] 0.035635552 0.04597701 1.906613e-04 -0.748946051   4.538897e-01
[25,] 0.032606647 0.04597701 1.932888e-04 -0.961700582   3.362000e-01
[26,] 0.035001352 0.04597701 1.897172e-04 -0.796851342   4.255374e-01
[27,] 0.012746354 0.02298851 9.812587e-05 -1.033949773   3.011596e-01
[28,] 0.061287917 0.06896552 2.773884e-04 -0.460979158   6.448136e-01
[29,] 0.014277403 0.02298851 9.683314e-05 -0.885240161   3.760271e-01
[30,] 0.009622875 0.01149425 4.924586e-05 -0.266671512   7.897221e-01
[31,] 0.014258398 0.02298851 9.705244e-05 -0.886168613   3.755267e-01
[32,] 0.005453443 0.01149425 4.986245e-05 -0.855476971   3.922871e-01
[33,] 0.043283712 0.05747126 2.367109e-04 -0.922143185   3.564539e-01
[34,] 0.020763514 0.03448276 1.393165e-04 -1.162328599   2.451020e-01
[35,] 0.081261843 0.06896552 2.794398e-04  0.735582222   4.619850e-01
[36,] 0.057419907 0.05747126 2.338437e-04 -0.003358489   9.973203e-01
[37,] 0.013497133 0.02298851 9.624821e-05 -0.967459309   3.333145e-01
[38,] 0.019289310 0.03448276 1.455643e-04 -1.259299080   2.079223e-01
[39,] 0.025996272 0.04597701 1.892938e-04 -1.452256513   1.464303e-01
[40,] 0.016092694 0.03448276 1.424776e-04 -1.540671121   1.233968e-01
[41,] 0.035952614 0.05747126 2.379439e-04 -1.395011407   1.630124e-01
[42,] 0.031690963 0.05747126 2.350604e-04 -1.681505286   9.266481e-02
[43,] 0.018750079 0.03448276 1.433314e-04 -1.314110709   1.888090e-01
[44,] 0.015449080 0.02298851 9.638666e-05 -0.767944457   4.425202e-01
[45,] 0.065760689 0.06896552 2.760533e-04 -0.192889342   8.470456e-01
[46,] 0.098966900 0.05747126 2.326002e-04  2.720804542   6.512325e-03
[47,] 0.085415780 0.05747126 2.385746e-04  1.809191360   7.042128e-02
[48,] 0.038816536 0.05747126 2.343951e-04 -1.218469473   2.230456e-01
[49,] 0.038931873 0.04597701 1.893501e-04 -0.511984469   6.086619e-01
[50,] 0.055098610 0.06896552 2.760948e-04 -0.834546363   4.039732e-01
[51,] 0.033405005 0.04597701 1.916312e-04 -0.908179070   3.637836e-01
[52,] 0.043040784 0.06896552 2.829941e-04 -1.541081516   1.232969e-01
[53,] 0.011297699 0.02298851 9.615920e-05 -1.192199867   2.331829e-01
[54,] 0.040968457 0.05747126 2.356318e-04 -1.075080164   2.823388e-01
[55,] 0.023629663 0.04597701 1.877170e-04 -1.631075961   1.028743e-01
[56,] 0.006281129 0.01149425 4.916619e-05 -0.743472246   4.571958e-01
[57,] 0.063918654 0.05747126 2.369553e-04  0.418842387   6.753313e-01
[58,] 0.070325003 0.05747126 2.381374e-04  0.832943753   4.048765e-01
[59,] 0.025947288 0.03448276 1.444058e-04 -0.710289083   4.775249e-01
[60,] 0.039752578 0.04597701 1.915656e-04 -0.449718820   6.529132e-01
[61,] 0.049934283 0.05747126 2.334965e-04 -0.493238743   6.218439e-01
[62,] 0.030964195 0.04597701 1.920248e-04 -1.083386776   2.786368e-01
[63,] 0.058129184 0.05747126 2.343319e-04  0.042979051   9.657182e-01
[64,] 0.046096514 0.04597701 1.932637e-04  0.008596093   9.931414e-01
[65,] 0.012459080 0.01149425 5.008051e-05  0.136337469   8.915545e-01
[66,] 0.091447733 0.05747126 2.377744e-04  2.203411744   2.756574e-02
[67,] 0.049575872 0.02298851 9.766513e-05  2.690329952   7.138140e-03
[68,] 0.107907212 0.04597701 1.933581e-04  4.453703219   8.440175e-06
[69,] 0.019616151 0.02298851 9.789454e-05 -0.340842743   7.332220e-01
[70,] 0.032923393 0.03448276 1.454032e-04 -0.129318589   8.971056e-01
[71,] 0.030317663 0.02298851 9.867859e-05  0.737806634   4.606320e-01
[72,] 0.019437582 0.03448276 1.455870e-04 -1.246912658   2.124295e-01
[73,] 0.055245460 0.04597701 1.932838e-04  0.666667559   5.049845e-01
[74,] 0.074278054 0.05747126 2.383538e-04  1.088613505   2.763244e-01
[75,] 0.013269580 0.02298851 9.719982e-05 -0.985792573   3.242349e-01
[76,] 0.049407829 0.03448276 1.463785e-04  1.233609606   2.173484e-01
[77,] 0.028605749 0.03448276 1.455139e-04 -0.487196415   6.261191e-01
[78,] 0.039087662 0.02298851 9.801040e-05  1.626174042   1.039126e-01
[79,] 0.031447120 0.04597701 1.877464e-04 -1.060416797   2.889550e-01
[80,] 0.064005294 0.05747126 2.359641e-04  0.425361422   6.705732e-01
[81,] 0.044606529 0.05747126 2.357330e-04 -0.837897118   4.020885e-01
[82,] 0.063700493 0.06896552 2.801427e-04 -0.314565243   7.530918e-01
[83,] 0.051142205 0.04597701 1.933560e-04  0.371456331   7.102977e-01
[84,] 0.102121112 0.04597701 1.610278e-04  4.424392623   9.671399e-06
[85,] 0.021901462 0.02298851 9.843172e-05 -0.109566928   9.127528e-01
[86,] 0.064931813 0.04597701 1.929430e-04  1.364597995   1.723794e-01
[87,] 0.031747344 0.04597701 1.909867e-04 -1.029658605   3.031703e-01
[88,] 0.015893319 0.02298851 9.765131e-05 -0.718000620   4.727569e-01
attr(,"cluster")
 [1] Low  Low  High High High High High High High Low  Low  High Low  Low  Low 
[16] High High High High Low  High High Low  Low  High Low  Low  Low  Low  Low 
[31] Low  Low  Low  High Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  High Low  Low  Low  Low 
[46] High High Low  Low  Low  Low  High Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  High Low  Low 
[61] Low  Low  Low  High High High Low  High Low  Low  High Low  High High Low 
[76] High Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  Low  High High Low  High Low  Low 
Levels: Low High
attr(,"gstari")
[1] FALSE
attr(,"call")
localG(x = hunan$GDPPC, listw = wm62_lw)
attr(,"class")
[1] "localG"

After that we will join the Gi values to their data. It converts the output vector into a r matrix and then binding it to the hunan data to produced a new SpatialPolygonDataframe.

hunan.gi <- cbind(hunan, as.matrix(gi.fixed)) %>%
  rename(gstat_fixed = as.matrix.gi.fixed.)

Mapping Gi values to fixed distance weights

gdppc <- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")

Gimap <-tm_shape(hunan.gi) +
  tm_fill(col = "gstat_fixed", 
          style = "pretty",
          palette="-RdBu",
          title = "local Gi") +
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

tmap_arrange(gdppc, Gimap, asp=1, ncol=2)

Variable(s) "gstat_fixed" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.

Gi statistics using adaptive distance

Here we will calculate the Gi values of the development of Hunan using the adaptive distance weight matrix instead of fixed distance.

fips <- order(hunan$County)
gi.adaptive <- localG(hunan$GDPPC, knn_lw)
hunan.gi <- cbind(hunan, as.matrix(gi.adaptive)) %>%
  rename(gstat_adaptive = as.matrix.gi.adaptive.)

Mapping Gi values with adaptive distance weights

Here we will visualise the hot and cold spots if there are any using a choropleth map.

gdppc<- qtm(hunan, "GDPPC")

Gimap <- tm_shape(hunan.gi) + 
  tm_fill(col = "gstat_adaptive", 
          style = "pretty", 
          palette="-RdBu", 
          title = "local Gi") + 
  tm_borders(alpha = 0.5)

tmap_arrange(gdppc, 
             Gimap, 
             asp=1, 
             ncol=2)

Variable(s) "gstat_adaptive" contains positive and negative values, so midpoint is set to 0. Set midpoint = NA to show the full spectrum of the color palette.